Brazil’s environmental policy is fulfilling its role in light of the bill, which has been brought to congress, which allows (legalizes) deforestation in the Amazon? Justify.

234 comentários sobre “Brazil’s environmental policy is fulfilling its role in light of the bill, which has been brought to congress, which allows (legalizes) deforestation in the Amazon? Justify.

  1. No, because deforesting the Amazon will allow the death of thousands of human beings alive, as the plants and animals that inhabit, we removing what was left of nature in our Brazil.

  2. The politicians do not comply with the right laws they want to be charging the people plus they are deforesting everything that pale front destroying our planet and our planet is dying the few.

  3. The politicians do not comply with the right laws they want to be charging the people plus they are deforesting everything that pale front destroying our planet and our planet is dying the few.

  4. No, because the Amazon is a very important area for Brazil and also for different parts of the world. Nature has many benefits and deforesting it or using it for other purposes for profit can bring great consequences to the world.

    1. Would you rather to still have deforestation, but in a illegal way as we have been seeing to happen in amazon. Or to have a law, that regulates that kind of activity?

    2. you do not think that deforesting would bring other types of benefits to our country? and what if this decret was approved thinking about something positive for us in Brazil?

  5. It is not fulfilling its work because the amazon is the lung of the world and it is a valuable asset for the whole world for the production of oxygen

  6. No, from the moment they release part of the Amazon to the deforestation, fail on your objective, it all just for money, all this of course if they approve the project, which unfortunately is on track to be approved, it will be terrible for the world will miss a great biodiversity in the world’s largest forest.

    1. You made it seem that the money that would result from the project would only benefit them, and if the money were used for the good of the country?

  7. Of the natural beauties found in the world, the Amazon is one of the extraordinary main. As Congress and also as agents of the environment, accepting the deforestation of something unique in Brazil, is to allow a piece of Brazil to be withdrawn. Therefore, Brazil’s environmental policy is not fulfilling its role in enabling such a bill.

  8. No, because with the deforestation of the Amazon, we will destroy the lung of the world, dramatically changing the climate not only in our country, in addition to climate change, we’d be affecting big biodiversity this kills loads, with this we can understand the selfish attitude of our politicians who think only of money and your own well-being and not of the population.

  9. No, because the great biodiversity that exists in the Amazon is immense with this law of deforestation, all biodiversity will be destroyed and everything for money is very wrong, if this law is accepted, everyone will be in a state of shock, because the lung of the world will be deforestation and biodiversity will be affected.

  10. No, the environmental policy is not fulfilling its role, if the project is approved a huge area of ​​the forest will be destroyed, this will affect the entire forest ecosystem, the Amazon is home to several species that in the end will all be affected, the forest still has a large role, it purifies a large proportion of oxygen, even having global importance.

  11. No, it is not fulfilling because it is letting a large chunk of the Amazon be destroyed for a pathetic cause like profits and tip payments to people who have exchanged favors. Money does not bring back the damage that will be done in that environment.

  12. No, it’s sad to know there are people that would destroy a forest that represents life for money, because without it I’m sure the world will be completely polluted, the forest is the world filter.

  13. Is not, after all the environmental policy is to preserve the environment and if this law is approved, without a doubt, will be in the opposite way to the initial purpose in which it was formed.

  14. No, I believe that they are not in agreement when they proposed to create laws that involve Amazon, as you can see in the media, no one agrees with what the Government is seeking to do. I believe that the Government doesn’t care much about what happens if this is put into practice, because they end up caring more about money than about the environment

  15. No, because Amazônia is home to many animals besides being one of the largest floras in the world. That can change the climate of the world and bring consequences. Amazon brings many benefits for Brazil and has a great biodiversity.To use nature for one’s own to profit is not to comply with the law.

  16. Definitely not, approving this project we’ll be trowing away all the years that we fought for our independence. If there’s a law against deforestation and your president disregards the law, what are we gonna obey?

    1. What this thing has to do with independence? If the president thinks it is the best option, shouldn’t we trust him? Can’t this bring something good for us?

  17. It is wrong, because they are deforesting the Amazon or it is against the principle of preserving the environment. And if this law is approved it will cause a great damage to the environment

    1. ok, but we have all the rest of the Amazona yet, do you really think that it will change too much our enviroment? stay to think how much better our economy would be with this new law….

  18. I think that the environmental politics is not carrying out his right paper, so their objective is to promote the best for our forests and forests, and they are approving of something absurd that is going round in whole world it announces it of what they will be able to clear the forest from a part of the Amazonian Forest, only for extraction and mining in the place, that will be going to change totally the flow of air in which we breathe since the forest is simply the lung of the world, to the biggest of the planet.

  19. I think the environmental Congress is not fulfilling your role, which is to protect the environment, because they are not positioning themselves on this law who want to deploy clearing the Amazon, the lung of the world. This law will hurt everyone, not just Brazil, so I think they should intervene somehow to prohibit this.

  20. No, at the moment the President Temer authorized without the consent of the people to mineral exploration in the Amazon, he exceeded the limits of the project, is to open this exploration needs to clear a large part of the forest

    1. Does the project was totally authorized? Because what I had been know is that just the areas which were already affected by illegal deforestation were going to be affected by this decret.

  21. No, because by allowing deforestation in a part of the Amazon, it will be contributing even more to the destruction of the most important forest in the world. This forest plays a very important role for the environmental balance of the world and, by deforestation, will eventually bring consequences for the entire planet.

  22. It’s definitely not correct, this project shouldn’t get its approval or even be supported by the government because Brazilian’s flora and fauna are extremely rich and diversified. We can’t allow that of of the biggest treasures of our country gets destroyed to generate profits that definitely won’t be used to repaid the damage.

  23. Yes, sadly the government has approved a provisional measure that decreases the enviromental protecionismo in regions where federal conservation areas are already illegally deforested.

  24. No, deforestation in the Amazon is daily, immense areas of land are destroyed, for soybean and cattle raising. The mining project in the Amazon is just one of many environmental crime cases. This will only be resolved when there is a more stringent policy regarding crimes against the environment.

  25. no, the politics of brazil is increasingly deplorable and if this law is approved we will be talking about a crime not only against nature and the world , but against ourselves.

  26. The environmental policy is establishing measures to strengthen the local, however, these measures are provisional, due to the lack of attention in the fulfillment of this duty. Legarize deforestation could aggravate the environment in various ways, such as the destruction of natural resources, the extraction of raw material from men, fauna and flora, moreover, with the neglect of environmental policy, the world would change forever. Bad conditions interfere with life in general, especially in the habitat of beings.

  27. Preserve the Amazon Forest is a must for everyone, especially of the rulers, but deforestation and the destruction of our forest, which is known as “the lungs of the world” continues to generate serious problems. This Bill sanctioned by the Brazilian Government allows the devastation and destruction of the forest will increase rather than decrease your preservation, gradually with the existing biodiversity there. Therefore, Brazil’s environmental policy is not complying with your paper, on approval of this project.

  28. No, the Amazon is the lung of the world. Clear and use it as a way to acquire profitable funds to the Government and not to the natural life of living beings, will cause a huge impact harming biodiversity and affecting the world.

    1. If it has been preserved for so long and knowing the problems that can be caused by deforestation, why would they risk so much damage just to get minerals? Would these be a real reason to cancel deforestation? What is the truth of this information?

  29. The duty of Brazil’s environmental policy is to defend the brazilian flora and fauna, allow the deforestation of an area so big is totally wrong, showing that the brazilian environmental policy is not fulfilling your role. The Amazon forest is the largest forest in the world, deforestation is the equivalent to the size of Denmark would affect the climate worldwide, so I consider the preservation of the Amazon as something of world interest, a law with the proposal to clear something as valuable as this forest cannot be approved.

  30. The Brazilian Government’s decision to open a reservation in the Amazon for mineral exploration, ira bring threats to biodiversity that we have, we cannot destroy our areas in Exchange for private interests, the ira reaction affect not only Brazil, but the whole balance of the planet, affecting all of us.

  31. It is not, because when desforation a part of the forest would be putting a Great parts of the forest a risk, being between them many species of animals and plants that only exist in that placement

  32. No, he is not fulfilling his role, because instead of helping the environment, he is trying to screw him, They should ensure that this law is not accepted in any way, Because the law that does not allow deforestation, is there to protect the “lung of the world”, And now they want to make an exception to take a large part his?! So no, they are not fulfilling their roles.

  33. No, because environmental policy carried out this project without knowing that environmental protection could decrease and if the population would approve.

  34. The Brazilian Government’s decision to open a reservation in the Amazon for mineral exploration, ira bring threats to biodiversity that we have, we cannot destroy our areas in Exchange for private interests, the ira reaction affect not only Brazil, but the whole balance of the planet, affecting all of us..

  35. No, this project cant be aproved, because the deforestation of the amazon will cause the death of many animals, And the production of oxygen will drastically reduce.

  36. No, because it’s very irresposable to deforest the biggest forest in Brazil, the Amazon gives us not just oxygen, but is one of the most diversified forests, home of lots of animal species and indigenous tribes, so it’s clearly wrong and it’s sad that or politicians don’t care about one of the most beautiful and precious things we have in our contry.

  37. No, the Amazon is the lung of the world, and it is where the purest air is, if this decision is approved, will create a great controversy, because the deforestation of a great part of this forest would harm Brazil, would be like taking a part of the Lung Of a person.

  38. No, because authorizing deforestation of the world’s largest rainforest,a place that live various animals and vegetations, is really stupid, that can only come from Brazil

    1. Do you think that horrible things just only come from brazil?
      The Amazonia forest is for sure, the biggest of the world. But it is not only our fault, have some of multinational companys who do much worse than Brazil companys, am i wrong?

  39. Is not right because the Amazon forest is considered as the “lungs of the world”, and this forest is considered the largest rainforest in the world and it is very important to everybody because it purifies the air and gives us oxygen.

  40. Yes, because when the consequences of deforestation arise people maybe they realise that if they continue like that humanity is going to be an extinct species.

    1. But why is it necessary to deforest to discover that this is going to happen? The obvious what is going to happen, do not need to commit this error.

      1. If the human being were more sensible, this project would not even have reached the camera, but since they intend to do this, let us charge with the consequences.

      1. The consequences of this degradation in the Amazon can lead to the extinction of species of animals and plants, causes serious imbalance in the ecosystem, contributes to increased pollution and leads to erosion of the soil, which becomes unprotected by cutting trees.

  41. No because in addition to destroy a natural reserve of great biodiversity, with deforestation regularised is a matter of time before tha amazon forest as a whole is lost and it would generate negative environmental consequences it is therefore of utmost responsability the government protect a national natural resourcrs instead of help to destroying them.

  42. No; because they will be attacking nature, assaulting the biodiversity, assaulting our health. I hope that they understand what they’re doing, really, since what they are doing can change the world and not a good thing, but for a bad thing.

  43. The environmental policy is not fulfilling your role because this project is coming strong. I think those people who created this project of clearance in Amazonia should be aware because the Amazon florest is the world. This florest is the lung of the world she purifies the oxygen. Probably deforestation will change the climate in the world

    1. – I do not think he is complying, because it is not right for Brazil to allow deforestation of the Amazon because it is the one that purifies and cleans our air. If they begin to deforest, after a while there is a possibility of worsening air quality, because the Amazon is the “lung” of the whole world.

      1. the amazon is the lung of the world because all the world’s air is purified In this forest and it is very important and we and the government can not destroy this biodiversity. The government does not fulfill its role, because its job is to do good to all and the environment and this is not happening, because they want to clear the part of a whole that is very important for the world population because without air we do not live.

  44. No, the duty of environmental policy is to preserve the Amazon rainforest that is abundant in various resources, and functions as a great reactor for the balance of the planet’s environmental stability.

  45. No, because environmental policy should be in favor of preserving the environment, not the destruction of the same, that is what will generate with the project of law that legalizes something absurd and we are not seeing anything to prevent this.

  46. I think the people responsible for the brazilian policy are not comprindo your duty. They are caring only the material gain from deforestation, they should be more concerned with the whole world, why the Amazon rainforest is the lung of the world, she purifies the air so people can have a better quality of life better and the pure oxygen.

  47. I do not think he is complying, because it is not right for Brazil to allow deforestation of the Amazon because it is the one that purifies and cleans our air. If they begin to deforest, after a while there is a possibility of worsening air quality, because the Amazon is the “lung” of the whole world.

  48. No, the role of environmental policy is to preserve the territory that Brazil has. Deforestation in the Amazon shouldn’t be allowed in any case. It’s an unique area, and it’s our duty to protect it.

  49. No, because this project, besides doing badly the main forest in the world, will harm not only the native people of this region but the whole world. we can not fail to mention that it will bring more benefits only to the politicians who only think of themselves instead of thinking about the population that gave them their vote.

  50. No, because this project, besides doing badly the main forest in the world, will harm not only the native people of this region but the whole world. we can not fail to mention that it will bring more benefits only to the politicians who only think of themselves instead of thinking about the population that gave them their vote.

  51. The government is acting disqualified and meaningless in this matter. I think that after so many fights, campaigns against illegal deforestation, they have not been worth anything, if it is to put everything to waste. It is a meaningless act, because this is at stake one of the greatest assets that we still have while many have no more. If the Amazon is devastated, what will be the icon of Brazil? Since we are known for our great natural wealth, what will remain? Only beaches? Sincerely Brazil is taking a wrong and totally absurd step.

  52. I do not think that environmental policy is fulfilling its role, because if it really was fulfilling, this law would not even have reached the congress And in my opinion I find it ridiculous to create a “idea” to deforest a part of the Amazon, the lung of our world, that is, it produces the air we breathe, keeping us alive. Putting our health, beyond biodiversity (with deforestation, the whole climate are altered) at risk, because of the profits they will receive, is not worth it! We must position ourselves and fight for the Amazon.

    1. What is the problem of deflating a small part of the Amazon forest ? What good is a giant pool of resources that we cannot enjoy? We are not Antarctica to possess a non-exploitation treaty.

  53. In today’s world, many people are greedy and this causes any chance do these such people do anything to earn money can etc., and it was so severe that many people are willing to clear a large part of the Amazon that besides affecting the b iodiversidade (Amazon has more than 30% of world biodiversity), deforestation affects, and the life of local populations, so we can see clearly that the project is not being long.

  54. No, the duty in ours politicizes environmental is to protect our biomas and not to propose an idea for extinguish-there, and no this just not executing his/her role the nature but it will also be harming the whole world

      1. And there must be an economic role…. and the well-being of the world no longer this a good size and the thousands of lives lives that there are not enough becomes the fact it exist

  55. no because if she were fulfilling your role, a projects like these would be vetoed by congress, but since we’re in a corrupt country, can we expect them to think more with their pockets than with their heads

  56. I do not think so, their duty is to protect nature, even if it acts a fault in the laws that allows this type of deforestation, they should fight for it not to happen

  57. The duty of environmental policy is to ensure sustainability by minimizing ecological impacts, deforestation of the Amazon Rainforest would waste your biological diversity and conservation of resources causing consequences worldwide.

  58. I think it’s very wrong what they want to do with the Amazon, because besides destroying a piece of the world’s lungs, they’ll also be taking home thousands of animals, and all because of money

  59. Honestly no, i think it’s ridiculous what they did with Brasil and the whole world. I just thinking that they will practically harm the oxygen of the world and change the weather, it’s sad.

  60. I think it’s wrong because the forest is many years there and is really helping our world, not a way she should be cleared because she gives us fresh air, nature and helps to be a good air to breathe.

    Everyone who wants to clear all they money, only live for that and not to build a better country, cleaner and more natural.

  61. The Amazon ir lung of the world because all the air that exists is purified in this forest and she ir very important and no one has the right to destroy this biodiversity. The government does not fulfill its role, because its work is to do good to society and the environment and it’s not happening, Because they want to take the part of a whole which is very important for the world population because no air without lives.

  62. No, because in 2004 the federal government approved the action plan for the prevention and control of deforestation in Amazonia, in order to reduce forest fires and deforestation, but recently laws, diminishing the protection of the preservation areas and allowing to extract the resources of the Amazon, which will provoke the devastation of our lungs.

  63. No, and once again we are faced with a failed policy in our country. The government does not understand that doing so is also affected, and that one day we will not be able to breathe, eat, or drink the money.

  64. No, because at the time that they allow deforestation, immediately happen innumerable deaths of the Amazonian fauna and flora. It can initiates a serie of environmental problems not only for Brazil, but also for the Earth Planet.

  65. I don’t think so. People are caring only about their gain with it. They should care about the world, not about money or something like that. I mean, this is very selfish. The Amazon rainforest gives us oxygen, it purifies the air, like, for free. If the deforestation begin for real, will we have to create machines to purify the air? Because I don’t think people will control themselves if the deforestation starts, and we’ll lost the lungs of the world for really selfish and dumb things, like interests related to money or some reason like that.

  66. The project that approves the exploration of an area in the Amazon rainflorest, that nowadays is occupy by local people and natural reseves, will cause a social and economic impact. This will afect in the food production, the water distribution, the life of people who live there and the ecosystem. So no, the environmental policy isn’t flufilling its role.

  67. No, the Amazon has great roles and much importance in the life of each, to kill and use it for other purposes would bring countless bad consequences for all

  68. The environmental Congress is not fulfilling its role in the face of the difficulties that the country is facing this is a drastic attitude and harms everyone because our forest is our resource and the source that keeps us alive.

  69. I really find it wrong because nature was a creation of God and we must not destroy it because our world is already very deforested and without the nature each made more we will be without oxygen

  70. No, because environmental policy was originally created to save our forests, and now it is no longer fulfilling its role. By supporting a project that only aims at money and does not think about the species (wild and endangered) that inhabit there, is not fulfilling its role as defender of nature.

  71. I think it is not fulfilling, because the forest is a type of life and deforesting is going to be taking a life, outside that the forests are something of paramount importance for the laneta, cleaning the air and being housing for the animals.

  72. In fact, we might consider that the amazon is an biological landscape and a home for thousands of species and a monetary way for hundreds of families in the forest hemisphere , and the deforestation will clearly kill this way of life and this massive space of naturalism.

  73. Certainly not, because as a policy, they should defend the wealth of our country and not exploit it to make a profit in mining and not think about the consequences in the future.

  74. the rulers are corrupt and have been telling lies about exploitation in the Amazon, as if nothing bad is going to happen, but they are only interested in money and nothing else

  75. no, they should end up in this they do not realize that they are destroying not only Amazonia but the world. it is the largest forest in the world with a huge biodiversity, and animals? Where will they go? probably will be killed to do various things, they will be ending the rest of the world.

  76. Clearly not, cause in the moment the three politics powers legalize, or thinking to do it, the deforestation of a forest so rich in biodiversity like our Amazônia they’re risking not just animals or native trees, but also putting in danger the natives and their home. These are not carrying out their duties, to preserve the citizens rights. Many preservation areas will  remain untouched. But there’s still a question, the man’s ambition will be greater than law? It will allow him to conquer forbidden lands?

  77. No, because we need forests to live, and the Amazon is a very important part of the world. Without Amazon, the life on Earth changes, and I think this is not good.

  78. no, because President Temer has created a project to legalize deforestation, so if the trees that clean our air, how will it be if this goes into operation?

  79. No, because the role of environmental policy would be to take care of the environment, and with this project will come many damages, both environmental, economic and social. And all this for selfish reasons, what ends up more losing than winning.

  80. I Think this is not the right way, since the Amazon has a very important role in the climate not only in the Americas, but in the world as a whole, and if deforestation is did without control, we all will take problems in the future.

Deixe uma resposta

O seu endereço de e-mail não será publicado. Campos obrigatórios são marcados com *